Dinosaur Evolution 1of5 Video

Dinosaurs rose to dominance in the Triassic and evolved into an amazing variety of species until the major extinction event at the end of the Cretaceous wiped almost all of them out. This series looks at the evolution of this incredible diversity and is a great example of how scientific hypotheses are modified as new evidence emerges.

This doco is courtesy of National Geographic. Please support this organisation by subscribing to their YouTube channel, cable channel and/or magazine.

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=887668013730BFEE

LETS GO OPTIMUS ...
LETS GO OPTIMUS PRIME!!!?

out of curiosity... ...
out of curiosity... can you answer to my challenge? What's your problem with chance? do you think that throwing a pair? of dice does not relate to chance? you are seriously demented.

ALTHOUGH I'M A ...
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The? Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)

WHAT IS SCIENCE? ...
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but? it's irrational to believe that an airplane or cell originated by undirected natural laws. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

SCIENCE SHOWS THE ...
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws? have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)

CREATIONISTS RIGHT ...
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy? occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.

EINSTEIN CONFIRMED ...
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn't be eternal. It had? a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.

NATURAL LIMITS TO ...
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats,? etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from sea sponge to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibria, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.

ALL? REAL EVOLUTION ...
ALL? REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there's information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That's evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

MUTATIONS: Random ...
MUTATIONS: Random genetic mutations,? caused by radiation, are destructive. Even if mutations are not immediately harmful, after enough of them accumulate they will be harmful. And, even if a good mutation does occur, for every good mutation there will be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, being harmful to the species as a whole and even causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.

NYLON-EATING ...
NYLON-EATING BACTERIA is not evidence of mutations producing new genetic information. The genes were degraded by mutations and that's how the capability? came about. "It is like damaging the interior of a lock so that more and different keys can now unlock it." Read The Internet article NYLON-EATING BACTERIA AND EVOLUTIONARY PROGRESS by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas.

GENETIC AND ...
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a? common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information, like other forms of information cannot happen by chance, so this is the best explanation.

"JUNK DNA" ISN'T ...
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: We were simply ignorant of their usefulness. Recent research published in? journals such as Nature shows that these "non-coding" segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Just because these segments of DNA don't code for proteins doesn't mean that they useless or broken-down genes. Read Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

IMAGINE A FISH WITH ...
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no? true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

NATURAL SELECTION ...
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER: It can only "select," not produce traits. If a variation survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron)? would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

WAR AMONG ...
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly? silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.

ARE FOSSILS REALLY ...
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Just google? title to access article. Examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species in fossils (i.e. reptile, and mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).

APES ARE QUITE ...
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even? a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.

DAWKINS, HITCHENS, ...
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read? analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. Just type your topic of interest in the "search" box on the site!

EXPLAINING HOW AN ...
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but? how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?

AMINO ACIDS CAN ...
AMINO ACIDS CAN COME BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Find out why. Read my Pravda Internet article: NASA, FANTASY, AND SCIENCE. Most (not all) scientists believe we're here by chance. That doesn't make the belief? a scientific fact. Scientists are human and they have personal motives influencing their various beliefs concerning origins. Mathematical probability shows that it is not rational nor scientific to believe that DNA and life came about by chance. Study the evidence yourself!

THE SCIENCE ...
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's? past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.

Didn't life begin ...
Didn't life begin in the oceans first, and then organisms started forming strange creatures on land which came to be? dinosaurs? I'm quite confused at how life started and where the organisms originated from.

I though that ...
I though that opening with? the dino neck was a dick...

it would make a ...
it would make a little sense since they would of had much more time then humans did to evolve but we have a few huge advantages: we didnt have as much enemies, according to the video it seems what made them have such interesting shapes and sizes probably was because they? were forced to adapt and evolve as a race, or die, also our unique monkey (now human) shape allows us to work with tools that most animals cant use let alone construct so they would lack the required shape

nope. man made god. ...
nope. man made god. thank? you.

2:35 - 2:37 dino ...
2:35 - 2:37 dino swag walk o_O?

His? real name is ...
His? real name is peter cullen

i wonder if ...
i wonder if Dinosaurs were not wiped? out ? What would they be like today ? They would probably living on Mars and have more knowledge than humans.

odd, because unlike ...
odd, because unlike other religions it doesn't conform to man's whims and desires, and it? was scientifically accurate from the beginning. Show me one religion that has a God that is totally inhuman.

Related News: